Apr
10
2010
0

Working From Home & Making Money Online


Jerry Traunfield, one of this season’s contestants, offers tips on how to master the art of the herb in your kitchen.

Jerry Traunfeld is chef and owner of the Seattle restaurant Poppy. Prior to opening his own restaurant, he received national acclaim as the chef at The Herbfarm, which was voted one of the top 10 restaurants in the United States in the 2007 Zagat Survey, is a Gayot’s Top 40 U.S. Restaurant, and is the only AAA 5-Diamond restaurant in the Northwest. He was a 2000 recipient of a James Beard Award for Best American Chef: Northwest and Hawaii. He is the author of the award-winning books The Herbfarm Cookbook and The Herbal Kitchen. Jerry also can be seen on this season’s Top Chef Masters on Bravo.

1. Slow Roasted Salmon with Spring Herb Sauce

It is this recipe that inspired me to write The Herbal Kitchen. When I began thinking of writing a second cookbook about 10 years ago, I was experimenting in my restaurant kitchen with roasting salmon at a very low temperature. The gentle heat consistently turns out perfectly done, moist fish, and miraculously it’s one of the easiest and most foolproof ways you can prepare it. Most home cooks had never heard of the technique, but it translates flawlessly to the home kitchen and I felt the world needed to know about it. I thought of how great it would be to put together a collection of many recipes with similar magic, borrowing techniques I discovered as a chef, translated into extremely simple and quick home recipes, and all made fabulous with fresh herbs.

2. Dilled Celery, Asian Pear, and Hazelnut Salad

This is has been my go-to cool weather salad for many years, and it’s a favorite in my cooking classes, where students are amazed at how such little effort can turn out such an amazing salad. It has celery, nuts and winter fruit in common with the classic Waldorf, but choosing Asian pear, hazelnuts, and mustard vinaigrette to replace mayonnaise gives it swank. I love to use the Duchilly variety of hazelnuts that are grown in Washington state for this dish. They have such thin skins that don’t need to be removed, and their glossy rich brown color is gorgeous with the green and gold of the other ingredients.

3. Parsley and Mint Soup

Many chefs use potatoes to thicken pureed soups like this one, but I always find the potato flavor noticeable and the texture never completely silky and smooth. I prefer to use a tiny bit of rice. It gives the soup a velvety body, almost as if it were enriched with cream, without contributing a taste. This takes lots of parsley, but after all, it is a parsley soup—just the thing to begin a lovely spring dinner.

4. Mushroom Marjoram Bread Pudding

When I was working on the recipe mix for The Herbal Kitchen I tried to think of recipes that would be most valuable to someone who loves to cook at home but has limited time. Everyone needs side dishes for holidays and dinner parties, things that you can prepare ahead, throw in the oven, and bring to the table along with your roast or turkey. A savory bread pudding is just the thing. For this one I use dried porcini, my precious pantry staple, which brings savory depth of flavor to dishes that are rich with cream and eggs. And I use generous amounts of fresh marjoram, the herb I always consider first when I cook with mushrooms.

5. Rhubarb Mint Cobbler

I’ve never been big on sugary, gooey desserts. Instead, give me tangy warm fruit, buttery crisp crust, and a creamy cold scoop of something on top. That’s why I’m a big fan of rhubarb cobbler. Rhubarb is so easy to prep, you just wash and slice, and cobbler biscuits come together in an instant, which means this is a dessert you can indulge in with about 20 minutes of effort.

Click here for more of Jerry’s recipes on Cookstr.com.

Plus: Check out Hungry Beast, for more news on the latest restaurants, hot chefs, and tasty recipes.

For more of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.

It's easy to say you support the troops, but numbers prove that the support often stops with the placement of a yellow ribbon on the back of a car. 1 in 5 veterans from the current wars has a service connected injury - both physical and mental. These veterans, who weren't responsible for the policy they enforced, have returned home to find that few companies are willing to hire them. Sure, times are tough all over the U.S., but read the following excerpt from an article in USA Today and tell me something else isn't going on:

Unemployment for male Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans has tripled since the recession began, rising from 5% in March 2007 to 15% last month, Labor Department statistics show.

More than 250,000 of these veterans were unemployed last month. Another 400,000 have left the workforce to attend college, raise children or because they have stopped trying to find a job, says Labor Department economist Jim Walker.

The overall national unemployment rate is 9.7%.

“It makes you almost want to go out and rip off all the 'Support Your Troops' bumper stickers,” says Joe Davis, a spokesman for the 1.5 million-member Veterans of Foreign Wars. “If you want to support your troops, give them a job.”

I know what is like to be an unemployed veteran and spent several years searching for a job. I applied nationally, willing to relocate for a position, for an opportunity to make money. No luck. Rejection after rejection started to make me believe that my military service was the main reason why I was perpetually unemployed. While I could've removed the Marine portion from my resume, I wasn't willing to do that: I am a Marine and worked hard to earn that title. I'd rather stand in a soup line.

Maybe, just maybe, there is a bit of veteran discrimination going on that few are willing to talk about. Maybe people are afraid of us, think we are going to overrun their perimeter or wig out on employees. Whatever the case, it has to stop.

We are an intelligent, hardworking, and dedicated bunch who may be the (gasp) Greatest Generation. Take for instance, the Operation In Their Boots (OITB) fellows: Chris Mandia earned the most prestigious scholarship the film studies graduate program at U.S.C. offers and recently had a movie he wrote, called Get Some, selected for the Short Film Corner at Cannes Film Festival (yeah, that Cannes); Victor Manzano, a proud father of two boys, is an entrepreneur who manages talent, produces music, trains E.O.D. (military bomb squad ), and fights for veterans' rights; Kyle Hartnett, a San Francisco State alumnus, is an accomplished musician who also has a movie making its rounds on the film festival circuit; and Tristan Dyer, a Brooks Institute alumnus, is a mad scientist of stop action animation (watch some of his work below) and has worked on numerous productions in the film industry. All five of us were enlisted.

The OITB fellows are not anomalies. We are standard for this generation of combat veterans, a generation that has a 15% unemployment rate.

We know vets will always have our backs and this is the reason we are working so hard on our films. We want to get cover theirs, too. We want to bring more people on board, get more Americans interested in the readjustment process, and show America that hiring a vet isn't just the right thing to do, but is also good for business. The more America starts to understand her veterans, the better this country will be. And if our documentaries help just one vet, then we will consider our filmmaking mission a success.

The Other Way Out from Tristan Dyer on Vimeo.

http://s592.photobucket.com/albums/tt2/atlantalease965/?action=view&current=8916202d0f108598a3ecc88210de32a0.flv bobby ferguson detroit http://www.metacafe.com/w/4432945 bobby ferguson detroit http://www.veoh.com/videos/v19992787St6W42xC bobby ferguson detroit http://www.viddler.com/explore/atlantalease965/videos/1/ bobby ferguson detroit http://www.dailymotion.com/video/21670531 bobby ferguson detroit http://youtube.com/watch?v=Bs8INHjwfPE

Job <b>News</b> | Operations Management Careers in Business

Select Category, 18504, Accounting Jobs News, Administration Jobs News, Automotive Jobs News, Banking Jobs News, Biotech Jobs News, Business Development Jobs News, Business Opportunity News, Clerical Jobs News, Construction Jobs News

NewsRoom - RSS <b>News</b> Android App Review by AndroidTapp.com <b>…</b>

Find your favorite news quickly with the built in search. Newsroom stays up to date without affecting your battery life so you can always see the latest at a glance. When searching for RSS feeds you click on the add button (or click on …

And in other <b>news</b> … MIA goes Gaga | Music | guardian.co.uk

All the news that's fit to link. … And in other news … MIA goes Gaga. This article was published on guardian.co.uk at 14.10 BST on Friday 9 April 2010. It was last modified at 14.10 BST on Friday 9 April 2010. …

Written by empfehll in: Uncategorized | Tags:
Feb
15
2010
0

Making Money Marketing

Australian tech startup Bonobo has publicly launched Yoink, a free online service to facilitate the worldwide reuse of everyday items.  

The new website and iPhone application is like eBay with a big twist: everything must be free, locally picked up and there is no bidding – the first person to “Yoink” an item from someone wins it instantly. People, cities and countries are ranked on a worldwide scoreboard determining who is the most generous at giving items away.

Getting free items is made easier by technology that identifies the nearest available items from your current location. Things already listed include televisions, clothes, mobile phones, satellite dishes and even free range eggs.  

Research conducted by Bonobo found that while most people loved the idea of reuse, the time necessary to commit to existing methods was a barrier. Yoink solves this by making the entire process of giving something away as simple as updating a Facebook or Twitter status.

I managed to catch up with Yoink co-founder Ben Hamey to ask him a few questions about the site and their plans. This is what he had to say:

Why start Yoink?

It occurred to us that it was a problem that needed solving. We had all moved house multiple times and been forced to throw away good things. We felt guilty that someone in the next street might desperately need what we were getting rid of but there was no way to matchmake it with them.

How is Yoink different from other methods for giving away stuff for free? 

When we started researching this area we found that people really wanted to do this, but it had to be extremely fast and a slick experience to boot.  There are lots of offline methods of reuse (ie. physical centres) but they are inherently not very scalable and take too much time. The existing online methods such as FreeCycle (6.9 million members) have large communities of frustrated users because it runs off a giant email list and becoming a member often involves applying to your local moderator for approval.

Yoink was built from scratch to facilitate reuse in the most elegant way possible.  We questioned absolutely everything and pared the concept down to basics – what can you give away and where is it?  We also realised mobile applications are important to encourage mass behavioural change, you have to be able to see something in your house that you don’t need, take your phone our of your pocket and have that item available in less than 30 seconds.

Conversely, you can be in a foreign suburb and look at your phone to instantly see what items are near you.

Who’s in the team and what are your backgrounds?

Bonobo has a core team of four partners and we all work remotely.  Michael Del Borrello in Sydney, Stuart Hall in Perth, Nathan Hamey and myself in Canberra.  We run the entire company online.

We’ve got a very diverse range of backgrounds which really strengthens our product development. We’re all young entrepreneurs with common interests and have  all worked in the software industry at some point whether in private enterprise, defence or government.  Between us we’ve got a wide spectrum of skills in product design, back end development, front end development, business development and marketing. We’re also all just very passionate about making ideas happen, whatever it takes!

What are your plans for Yoink ?

Our only priority is growing the community and making it as useful as possible.  We’ve got a big schedule of updates with new features and new mobile client support, watch this space!

 —–

I love this site, mostly because I love the fact that reuse extends the lifetime of consumer products to save energy, materials and money. Too many times I’ve gone to throw something away, thought that maybe someone could use it, then thought “nah…too hard”

If Yoink can make it so that, even once in a while, people like me change their mind and go “yeah…I’ll put it up on Yoink” then they’ll have made a massive difference to the amount valuable stuff that gets thrown out on a daily basis.

Go check it out.

Tags: Bonobo, Free, Reuse, Yoink 

More from Dow Jones:

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro on Friday said final rules reining in short selling are expected
“in the coming weeks” and the agency will begin examining marketing of retirement products that offer a “sell it and forget about it” mentality.

On short selling, Schapiro told reporters, “Hopefully, you'll see something in the first quarter.”

Schapiro also said SEC staff will begin setting up a new system to consolidate market data across a range of exchanges and other trading platforms, which will give the regulator a powerful tool in detecting illegal activity.

“The past year has witnessed one of the most significant rule-making agendas in years–an agenda that shows we are willing to address challenging issues and make the tough choices. The year ahead will be no different,” Schapiro said in a speech before the Practising Law Institute.

Regarding short selling, the commission is close to finalizing a rule to rein in short selling. The SEC has asked for comments on whether it should reinstate a short selling restriction known as the “uptick” rule, in which investors can only short a stock after it rose or ticked higher.

Regulators and industry insiders agree that the previous uptick rule isn't workable with current lightening speed trades. But the SEC is expected to approve a modified rule designed to put a stop to short selling as stocks are falling. That rule is expected to be the next major action taken by the SEC.

The other major rule on track to be finalized by the SEC would give shareholders greater access to the proxy voting process. The SEC is mulling whether to give shareholders an automatic inroad to the proxy system under certain conditions or simply allow them to vote for such a plan.

“I'm hopeful over the next several months that we'll be able to conclude on proxy access,” Schapiro said after her speech. The SEC has received hundreds of comment letters on the idea with very diverse viewpoints, she said.

On retirement products, Schapiro said she wants SEC staff to look into different kinds of “target date funds” that contain a target retirement date in their names.

“In the year ahead, we are going to confront the issue of the potential for target date fund names to confuse investors, or lull them into a false sense of security. I have asked the staff to prepare a rule proposal to provide additional information to investors when a fund includes a date in its name,” Schapiro said.

Schapiro also said she wants to implement fundamental changes in the money market industry, moving it away from the current $1-per-share standard to a floating number that she believes would more accurately reflect funds' fluctuations, an idea unpopular with most funds.

The SEC approved rules last month to require funds to disclose fluctuations around the $1-per-share standard on a monthly basis after a 60-day lag.

Schapiro also said SEC staff this spring will make recommendations on creating a consolidated audit trail for orders and executions across all markets.

“Currently, the self-regulatory organizations have their own separate audit trail systems to track information relating to orders in their respective markets. But, it is difficult to connect the dots and ferret out wrongdoing as trading activity frequently occurs across various markets,” Schapiro said.

Schapiro last year created a task force to study how such a system would work. The acting head of the trading and markets division said last year the system would require “substantial coordination” among various exchanges and other trading bodies.

But the consolidated system also would be invaluable for exchanges and the commission to detect illegal activity across multiple markets.

The new surveillance system will be part of a state-of-the-art data collection, surveillance and analytics room envisioned by the Enforcement Division.

online stock trading, robert shumake, robert shumake, loss mitigation training

Written by empfehll in: Uncategorized | Tags:
Feb
05
2010
0

Affiliate Making Money

Columbus, Ohio: Meijer is running a 3/$5 sale ($1.67/bag). With the doubled $.75 coupon…just $.17/bag. My daughter and I bought 2 bags today for $.34, then found a quarter on the ground upon leaving the store. I wanted to consider this two bags for $.09; but she (age 2), claimed the coin for her new bank….

A company that has built—and is already publicizing—a BBC iPlayer app for the iPhone may get stalled at the gates by the BBC, we have learned.

If it goes live, the Rewat.ch app, from Manchester-based developers Camiloo, would be the first iPlayer app for iPhones on the market, according to the BBC. But the BBC may have none of it: “Camiloo is not a licensed distributor of BBC content online or on mobile. The BBC routinely looks for unauthorised usage of our brand across all platforms and when we encounter it we work to resolve the issue,” a spokesperson told paidContent:UK. She would not comment further on whether this means it would bar the app. Rewat.ch would sell for £1.19 but would otherwise be free to use.

Rewat.ch, which is in Apple’s approval stage as Camiloo waits for the BBC to give the go-ahead, points to wider questions on BBC content syndication. Mark Newby, Camiloo’s MD, tells us that it is using publicly accessed RSS feeds of iPlayer content, taken from the BBC’s mobile site, and therefore is not doing anything illicit in its app. But last year, IP Vision got banned from putting its own implementation of the iPlayer into its set-top boxes for its Fetch TV IPTV service.The BBC “provided reasonable arguments as to why implementing a self-build iPlayer for IP Vision could have jeopardised both value for money and the BBC’s brand,” the BBC Trust concluded at the time.

Yet there are already apps in the iTunes store that are sourcing BBC content, but are not official BBC apps. This would argue for Re.wind making its way to the store, too.

The BBC has developed a number of mobile-friendly websites for its services, and it provides an iPlayer widget for selected Nokia devices. And there are niche sites on the Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) store for certain products such as its Good Food magazine and site, and Lonely Planet travel guides. These are produced by the BBC’s commercial division, BBC Worldwide. But it has not launched any Apple apps for the bulk of its content.

It’s not quite clear why BBC hasn’t done more on iPhones: some believe that the BBC’s delay on apps is down to Apple’s own T&C’s; others believe it is because of the BBC’s own license terms. The BBC will not comment on the speculation but tells us this: “We are always keen to make our content available to as many people on as many platforms as possible. We are in continuous discussions with a number of manufacturers with the hope of making our services available via their platforms in the future.”

Newby says that Rewat.ch offers a better experience over the iPlayer site that users can access via iPhones. The app works on a combination of 3G and WiFi, and caches content on the phone for when a person is offline. The BBC’s web version of the iPlayer requires 3G bandwidth to run its service, but this can prove to be a bandwidth hog—3UK says iPlayer can use up to 1600kbps (compared to YouTube at 300kbps) on the network. Newby says that, in fact, some mobile operators restrict usage of iPlayer as a result.

The plan would be to enhance Rewat.ch with content from the online edition of iPlayer eventually. The PC site contains more video and audio than the mobile edition, including more local affiliate coverage as well as subtitles for the hearing impaired. Newby says that this would allow Re.wind to be used on the larger iPad format as well.

Related Stories

http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71 http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.prlog.org/tag/online-stock-trading/ http://www.prlog.org/10219817-online-traders-discover-reits-and-real-estate-mutual-funds-to-be-good-investment.html http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71

Columbus, Ohio: Meijer is running a 3/$5 sale ($1.67/bag). With the doubled $.75 coupon…just $.17/bag. My daughter and I bought 2 bags today for $.34, then found a quarter on the ground upon leaving the store. I wanted to consider this two bags for $.09; but she (age 2), claimed the coin for her new bank….

A company that has built—and is already publicizing—a BBC iPlayer app for the iPhone may get stalled at the gates by the BBC, we have learned.

If it goes live, the Rewat.ch app, from Manchester-based developers Camiloo, would be the first iPlayer app for iPhones on the market, according to the BBC. But the BBC may have none of it: “Camiloo is not a licensed distributor of BBC content online or on mobile. The BBC routinely looks for unauthorised usage of our brand across all platforms and when we encounter it we work to resolve the issue,” a spokesperson told paidContent:UK. She would not comment further on whether this means it would bar the app. Rewat.ch would sell for £1.19 but would otherwise be free to use.

Rewat.ch, which is in Apple’s approval stage as Camiloo waits for the BBC to give the go-ahead, points to wider questions on BBC content syndication. Mark Newby, Camiloo’s MD, tells us that it is using publicly accessed RSS feeds of iPlayer content, taken from the BBC’s mobile site, and therefore is not doing anything illicit in its app. But last year, IP Vision got banned from putting its own implementation of the iPlayer into its set-top boxes for its Fetch TV IPTV service.The BBC “provided reasonable arguments as to why implementing a self-build iPlayer for IP Vision could have jeopardised both value for money and the BBC’s brand,” the BBC Trust concluded at the time.

Yet there are already apps in the iTunes store that are sourcing BBC content, but are not official BBC apps. This would argue for Re.wind making its way to the store, too.

The BBC has developed a number of mobile-friendly websites for its services, and it provides an iPlayer widget for selected Nokia devices. And there are niche sites on the Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) store for certain products such as its Good Food magazine and site, and Lonely Planet travel guides. These are produced by the BBC’s commercial division, BBC Worldwide. But it has not launched any Apple apps for the bulk of its content.

It’s not quite clear why BBC hasn’t done more on iPhones: some believe that the BBC’s delay on apps is down to Apple’s own T&C’s; others believe it is because of the BBC’s own license terms. The BBC will not comment on the speculation but tells us this: “We are always keen to make our content available to as many people on as many platforms as possible. We are in continuous discussions with a number of manufacturers with the hope of making our services available via their platforms in the future.”

Newby says that Rewat.ch offers a better experience over the iPlayer site that users can access via iPhones. The app works on a combination of 3G and WiFi, and caches content on the phone for when a person is offline. The BBC’s web version of the iPlayer requires 3G bandwidth to run its service, but this can prove to be a bandwidth hog—3UK says iPlayer can use up to 1600kbps (compared to YouTube at 300kbps) on the network. Newby says that, in fact, some mobile operators restrict usage of iPlayer as a result.

The plan would be to enhance Rewat.ch with content from the online edition of iPlayer eventually. The PC site contains more video and audio than the mobile edition, including more local affiliate coverage as well as subtitles for the hearing impaired. Newby says that this would allow Re.wind to be used on the larger iPad format as well.

Related Stories

Shashi Bellamkonda by affiliatesummit

Silent Hill composer joins Grasshopper <b>News</b> | Eurogamer

Read our Silent Hill composer joins Grasshopper <b>News</b> for PC, PlayStation 2, PSP, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Wii.

CBS, <b>News</b> Corp. Grab For Station Retransmission Dollars Could Get <b>…</b>

Improved earnings at broadcast network media owners such as <b>News</b> Corp. and CBS cannot be sustained without seizing a larger chunk of the retransmissio.

AMERICAblog <b>News</b>: Unemployment drops to 9.7% but 'economists <b>…</b>

<b>News</b> and opinion about US politics from a liberal perspective.

http://www.shumakerelays.com/

Written by empfehll in: Uncategorized | Tags:
Feb
05
2010
0

Being Right or Making Money

Something odd happened today at the Washington Post.  The editors at the Post wrote a solid editorial on China and, a page later, the esteemed George Will got caught in the web of China myths.

The main point of the Post editorial is spot on: the Obama administration largely misplayed China policy in its first year.  There are many possible explanations why; one is the administration overestimates American weakness and Chinese strength. The Post is absolutely right to call for the U.S., which is far more powerful, to make foreign policy accordingly.

A critical aspect of this better policy is to push for free trade, by China but also by America and around the world.  Recognizing American strengths and interests does not mean China-bashing.  Some of the outcry against the PRC is self-interested protectionism masked in false claims of Chinese dominance. It is aimed at helping certain groups while harming America as a whole.

George Will also advocates better U.S. policy but, in doing so, he makes the same mistake as the Obama Administration.  Will is rightly unhappy with our deficit and the backward-looking nature of government spending.  These are very serious threats to American prosperity.

However, Will then contrasts the bad American situation to a supposedly great Chinese situation, where the PRC spends wisely and will dominate the global economy.  That is not even close to being true.

China can always look good. This is partly because it has genuinely become much bigger and wealthier since market reform began 30 years ago and partly because it can publish any statistics the Party wants, no matter how strange. Due to this success and “flexibility,” there are so many things to say about the Chinese economy that someone could spend 60 hours a week doing so.

The number one reason China might never equal the size of the American economy, despite having 1 billion more people, is something Will keys on – demographics. China is about to get older.  Much older, very fast.  The infamous one-child policy means there’s soon to be a whole generation where most Chinese families have two elderly parents supported by one working child.

That’s far worse than what the U.S. faces in terms of aging. It’s more like the Japanese situation, and Japan has been stuck in the mud for 20 years. Worse yet, China is still much poorer than the U.S. or Japan – that one child supporting two parents isn’t going to be making nearly as much money as the average American.

Both parts of the Post are right that we need to fix our policies, foreign and especially domestic.  What we should avoid is swallowing stories about the PRC that are based on very little.  That lack of knowledge of China has been part of the problem; it doesn’t work as part of any solution.

The president, we were told, spent a good deal of time in the days leading up to his State of the Union address, going over it with a fine-toothed comb, making changes and additions in longhand.

But judging from the speech, he also spent a lot of time going over the results of focus groups and polls. Indeed, the speech, despite its charm, humor, and occasionally impassioned rhetoric, had the feel of being focus-grouped within an inch of its life. There was a decidedly paint-by-poll-numbers air about it.

Focus group participants say they are concerned about the deficit? Then let's throw in a 3-year spending freeze, delivered with a populist spin. “Like any cash-strapped family,” the president said, “we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.”

Sure, the freeze will actually have little impact on the multi-trillion dollar deficit, exempts budget-bloating defense spending, and, as Steve Clemons puts it, “will essentially forfeit America's growth future to China.” But “spending freeze” moved the test dials — so spending freeze it is!

Remember when serious health care reform was going to be the main path to reducing long-term budget deficits? Not anymore. Now we're going to freeze spending — except, of course, on the wars of choice we are fighting, at a cost of $250 billion a year, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The president and his team know that the spending freeze is little more than what The Economist's Ryan Avent calls “a bright shining gimmick.” And no one in the administration could really have believed that conservatives would suddenly swoon and fall into line at the mere mention of “freezing discretionary spending.”

Indeed, the reaction of Republicans to his announcement that the freeze won't take effect until 2011 was so derisive that Obama fired back with a caustic ad lib: “That's how budgets are done.”

The truth is, the American people are not angry because of all the money the government has spent this year — except, of course, the people who believe Obama was born in Kenya, is a Muslim, and a Socialist. The rest of the people, the ones Obama has a chance of reaching, are angry because the vast majority of that money went to — and continues to go to — rescuing Wall Street, which has thanked taxpayers by reducing lending, recording record profits, paying out massive bonuses, and using our money to pay lobbyists to scuttle financial reform. That is what is putting voters on the electoral warpath.

The president's Pander-palooza continued with the middle class-friendly initiatives he announced on Monday and touched on again during the SOTFG (State of the Focus Group). As I wrote earlier this week, these modest tax credits and subsidies “are all very good ideas, but hardly commensurate with the deep crisis America's middle class is in.” The New York Times labeled them the “opposite of bold.”

They are also incredibly similar to the “middle class bill of rights” Bill Clinton rolled out in the wake of the mid-term shellacking Democrats took in 1994. Obama has apparently decided that he'll cut to the chase and preemptively follow Clinton's third-way strategies. So get ready to wave goodbye to the Big Bang agenda, and say hello to bite-sized programs — Obama equivalents of school uniforms, extended hospital stays for new moms, and midnight basketball leagues. But when Wall Street was in trouble it didn't get a bunch of micro ideas, it got a huge bailout.

But 2010 isn't 1994. Robert Reich, who, as Clinton's Secretary of Labor had a front-row seat to that time, lays out the vast gulf between then and now, writing on HuffPost that in 1994 “the U.S. economy was coming out of a recession. It was of no consequence that Clinton's jobs proposals were small or that he moved to the right and whacked the budget, because within a year the great American jobs machine was blasting away and the middle class felt a lot better… Today, though, there's no sign on the horizon of a vigorous recovery.”

President Obama is not going to be able to micro-trend his way into this recovery. And he's not going to be able to win back the confidence of the American people with worthwhile but small bore initiatives like child care tax credits. And he's got to make sure his team doesn't go around making claims like the one Austan Goolsbee made on MSNBC the other morning, when he told Chuck Todd that child care is “highly tied to the job market” and that many people are out of work because they can't afford to get someone to take care of their children. But people aren't out of work because they can't afford a baby sitter; they're out of work because there are six applicants for every job opening.

And while most State of the Union speeches have a bit of a kitchen-sink feel to them, this one seemed particularly so with its blink-and-you-missed-it mentions of “earmark reform” and cracking “down on violations of equal pay laws — so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work.” It felt less like an overriding vision for the country, and more like an attempt to deliver at least one applause line for every constituency in the country.

That's not political leadership. Obama clearly understands this. It's why he ended his speech by mocking politicians who “do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation.” And he just as clearly has the ability to articulate a bold vision for the nation and lead it where it desperately needs to go.

But he didn't do it tonight.

P.S.: It was great to hear the president embrace the Move Your Money concept, “proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat.”

http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71 http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.prlog.org/tag/online-stock-trading/ http://www.prlog.org/10219817-online-traders-discover-reits-and-real-estate-mutual-funds-to-be-good-investment.html http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71

Something odd happened today at the Washington Post.  The editors at the Post wrote a solid editorial on China and, a page later, the esteemed George Will got caught in the web of China myths.

The main point of the Post editorial is spot on: the Obama administration largely misplayed China policy in its first year.  There are many possible explanations why; one is the administration overestimates American weakness and Chinese strength. The Post is absolutely right to call for the U.S., which is far more powerful, to make foreign policy accordingly.

A critical aspect of this better policy is to push for free trade, by China but also by America and around the world.  Recognizing American strengths and interests does not mean China-bashing.  Some of the outcry against the PRC is self-interested protectionism masked in false claims of Chinese dominance. It is aimed at helping certain groups while harming America as a whole.

George Will also advocates better U.S. policy but, in doing so, he makes the same mistake as the Obama Administration.  Will is rightly unhappy with our deficit and the backward-looking nature of government spending.  These are very serious threats to American prosperity.

However, Will then contrasts the bad American situation to a supposedly great Chinese situation, where the PRC spends wisely and will dominate the global economy.  That is not even close to being true.

China can always look good. This is partly because it has genuinely become much bigger and wealthier since market reform began 30 years ago and partly because it can publish any statistics the Party wants, no matter how strange. Due to this success and “flexibility,” there are so many things to say about the Chinese economy that someone could spend 60 hours a week doing so.

The number one reason China might never equal the size of the American economy, despite having 1 billion more people, is something Will keys on – demographics. China is about to get older.  Much older, very fast.  The infamous one-child policy means there’s soon to be a whole generation where most Chinese families have two elderly parents supported by one working child.

That’s far worse than what the U.S. faces in terms of aging. It’s more like the Japanese situation, and Japan has been stuck in the mud for 20 years. Worse yet, China is still much poorer than the U.S. or Japan – that one child supporting two parents isn’t going to be making nearly as much money as the average American.

Both parts of the Post are right that we need to fix our policies, foreign and especially domestic.  What we should avoid is swallowing stories about the PRC that are based on very little.  That lack of knowledge of China has been part of the problem; it doesn’t work as part of any solution.

The president, we were told, spent a good deal of time in the days leading up to his State of the Union address, going over it with a fine-toothed comb, making changes and additions in longhand.

But judging from the speech, he also spent a lot of time going over the results of focus groups and polls. Indeed, the speech, despite its charm, humor, and occasionally impassioned rhetoric, had the feel of being focus-grouped within an inch of its life. There was a decidedly paint-by-poll-numbers air about it.

Focus group participants say they are concerned about the deficit? Then let's throw in a 3-year spending freeze, delivered with a populist spin. “Like any cash-strapped family,” the president said, “we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.”

Sure, the freeze will actually have little impact on the multi-trillion dollar deficit, exempts budget-bloating defense spending, and, as Steve Clemons puts it, “will essentially forfeit America's growth future to China.” But “spending freeze” moved the test dials — so spending freeze it is!

Remember when serious health care reform was going to be the main path to reducing long-term budget deficits? Not anymore. Now we're going to freeze spending — except, of course, on the wars of choice we are fighting, at a cost of $250 billion a year, in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The president and his team know that the spending freeze is little more than what The Economist's Ryan Avent calls “a bright shining gimmick.” And no one in the administration could really have believed that conservatives would suddenly swoon and fall into line at the mere mention of “freezing discretionary spending.”

Indeed, the reaction of Republicans to his announcement that the freeze won't take effect until 2011 was so derisive that Obama fired back with a caustic ad lib: “That's how budgets are done.”

The truth is, the American people are not angry because of all the money the government has spent this year — except, of course, the people who believe Obama was born in Kenya, is a Muslim, and a Socialist. The rest of the people, the ones Obama has a chance of reaching, are angry because the vast majority of that money went to — and continues to go to — rescuing Wall Street, which has thanked taxpayers by reducing lending, recording record profits, paying out massive bonuses, and using our money to pay lobbyists to scuttle financial reform. That is what is putting voters on the electoral warpath.

The president's Pander-palooza continued with the middle class-friendly initiatives he announced on Monday and touched on again during the SOTFG (State of the Focus Group). As I wrote earlier this week, these modest tax credits and subsidies “are all very good ideas, but hardly commensurate with the deep crisis America's middle class is in.” The New York Times labeled them the “opposite of bold.”

They are also incredibly similar to the “middle class bill of rights” Bill Clinton rolled out in the wake of the mid-term shellacking Democrats took in 1994. Obama has apparently decided that he'll cut to the chase and preemptively follow Clinton's third-way strategies. So get ready to wave goodbye to the Big Bang agenda, and say hello to bite-sized programs — Obama equivalents of school uniforms, extended hospital stays for new moms, and midnight basketball leagues. But when Wall Street was in trouble it didn't get a bunch of micro ideas, it got a huge bailout.

But 2010 isn't 1994. Robert Reich, who, as Clinton's Secretary of Labor had a front-row seat to that time, lays out the vast gulf between then and now, writing on HuffPost that in 1994 “the U.S. economy was coming out of a recession. It was of no consequence that Clinton's jobs proposals were small or that he moved to the right and whacked the budget, because within a year the great American jobs machine was blasting away and the middle class felt a lot better… Today, though, there's no sign on the horizon of a vigorous recovery.”

President Obama is not going to be able to micro-trend his way into this recovery. And he's not going to be able to win back the confidence of the American people with worthwhile but small bore initiatives like child care tax credits. And he's got to make sure his team doesn't go around making claims like the one Austan Goolsbee made on MSNBC the other morning, when he told Chuck Todd that child care is “highly tied to the job market” and that many people are out of work because they can't afford to get someone to take care of their children. But people aren't out of work because they can't afford a baby sitter; they're out of work because there are six applicants for every job opening.

And while most State of the Union speeches have a bit of a kitchen-sink feel to them, this one seemed particularly so with its blink-and-you-missed-it mentions of “earmark reform” and cracking “down on violations of equal pay laws — so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work.” It felt less like an overriding vision for the country, and more like an attempt to deliver at least one applause line for every constituency in the country.

That's not political leadership. Obama clearly understands this. It's why he ended his speech by mocking politicians who “do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation.” And he just as clearly has the ability to articulate a bold vision for the nation and lead it where it desperately needs to go.

But he didn't do it tonight.

P.S.: It was great to hear the president embrace the Move Your Money concept, “proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat.”

JXD V3: Foldable MP4 Player-Game Console Hybrid PMP with 5.0MP <b>…</b>

The rest of the <b>news</b>. 2/4 > Teclast New Apple wannabe X13-S01. 2/3 > Poteto No Te… Takara Tomy latest Chips grabber… Look Ma No hands !!! 2/3 > New Toshiba Portégé M780 Multitouch Convertible Tablet powered by Intel Core i3, i5 …

SEOmoz | Getting Started Publishing on Google <b>News</b>

How do you get articles indexed and ranking in Google <b>News</b>? This blog post, which builds off the information provided in the Google <b>News</b> publisher help center and in Maile Ohye's awesome video on Google <b>News</b>, provides publishers with a …

Teens prefer reading <b>news</b> online to Twitter | Media | guardian.co.uk

While most teenagers reject Twitter and blogging, 62% of them like to read their <b>news</b> online, US research reveals. By Mercedes Bunz.

http://www.shumakerelays.com/

Written by empfehll in: Uncategorized | Tags:
Feb
04
2010
0

Secrets to Making Money

The Fed is pulling out all stops to defend its secrets, including publishing self-serving mathematical gibberish. Please consider the St. Louis Fed article on the Social Cost of Transparency.

Unless you are an academic wonk, you will be stymied by pages that look like this …

There are 24 pages of such nonsense with titles like

  • 2.2 Private Information and Full Commitment
  • 2.3 Private Information and Limited Commitment
  • 3.2.1 Decision Making in the Day
  • 3.2.2 Decision Making at Night
  • 3.2.4 A No-News Economy

Just for good measure here is the page describing 3.2.4 A No-News Economy

The article culminates with …

For an asset economy then, the prescription of “full transparency” is not generally warranted.

Approaching the problem under the premise that fuller transparency is always desirable may not be the right place to start.

Hiding Behind Empirical Formulas

The problem is Bernanke places his complete faith in such gibberish, so much so that he has lost all sense of real world action by real people. The result is that in spite of his PhD, he could not see a housing bubble that was obvious to anyone using a single ounce of common sense.

Moreover, had Bernanke simply opened his eyes instead of relying on a poor interpretation of an already fatally flawed Taylor Rule, the credit/housing bubble would not have gotten as big as it did, and we might not be discussing the above ridiculous mathematical formulas that supposedly show us the Fed needs to be secretive.

For more on Bernanke's love affair with the Taylor Rule (even though Taylor Disputes Bernanke on its usage), please see Taylor, NY Times, Dean Baker Call Out Bernanke.

Appeals Court To Hear Bloomberg's Freedom of Information Suit

Bloomberg has been in a battle with the Fed for two years over the Fed's “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. In August it “won” the lawsuit but the Fed has appealed.

Please consider Federal Reserve Seeks to Protect U.S. Bailout Secrets.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan will decide whether the Fed must release records of the unprecedented $2 trillion U.S. loan program launched after the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. In August, a federal judge ordered that the information be released, responding to a request by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Banks and the Fed warn that bailed-out lenders may be hurt if the documents are made public, causing a run or a sell-off by investors. Disclosure may hamstring the Fed’s ability to deal with another crisis, they also argued. The lower court agreed with Bloomberg.

The ruling by the three-judge appeals panel may not come for months and is unlikely to be the final word. The loser may seek a rehearing or appeal to the full appeals court and eventually petition the U.S. Supreme Court, said Anne Weismann, chief lawyer for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a Washington advocacy group that supports Bloomberg’s lawsuit.

In her Aug. 24 ruling, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in New York said loan records are covered by FOIA and rejected the Fed’s claim that their disclosure might harm banks and shareholders. An exception to the statute that protects trade secrets and privileged or confidential financial data didn’t apply because there’s no proof banks would suffer, she said.

The central bank “speculates on how a borrower might enter a downward spiral of financial instability if its participation in the Federal Reserve lending programs were to be disclosed,” Preska, the chief judge of the Manhattan federal court, said in her 47-page ruling. “Conjecture, without evidence of imminent harm, simply fails to meet the board’s burden” of proof.

By the time the documents are released, the information may be useless, or not. Regardless, the battle is worth fighting just over the principles of the matter.

Fed Faces Subpoena Over AIG bailout

On Tuesday I commented on House Plans To Subpoena Geithner Over AIG Decisions

AP

Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., said Tuesday he will subpoena the New York Fed for documents related to the bailout of failed insurer American International Group Inc.

Towns chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The committee is investigating deals that diverted billions of AIG bailout dollars to banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

The committee has been investigating e-mails from New York Fed lawyers telling AIG not to disclose details about the deal. The e-mails were released last week by California Rep. Darrell Issa., the committee's top Republican.

Issa asked Towns to subpoena the New York Fed after the Fed blocked a separate request for documents.

Audit The Fed

Of course we cannot forget Ron Paul's Audit The Fed measure that has passed the house. These measures show just how angry everyone is over the Fed.

The Fed has increased that anger and resentment by pointing the finger at everyone else. For details, please see Ben Bernanke Looks In Mirror, Sees Barney Frank.

Three Front Attack

  • Appeals Court To Hear Bloomberg's Freedom of Information Suit
  • Fed Faces Subpoena Over AIG bailout
  • Audit The Fed

The more the Fed squirms in secrecy and denial, the more public resentment builds. The more public resentment builds, the more likely the Senate will go along with “audit the Fed”.

What's On The Fed's Balance Sheet?

The Fed's balance sheet (better thought of as a diaper or a garbage dump), is not only smelly, it is bulging bigger by the day.

We have a right to know what the Fed is doing, what the assets it is holding are worth, and what arrangements it might have illegally made with AIG or others.

Yesterday the Washington Post reported Federal Reserve earned $45 billion in 2009.

I have a few questions.

Really?!

  • Does that count the $185 billion the NY Fed crammed down taxpayers throats over AIG?
  • Does that count the real cost of any of its other inane off-balance-sheet recommendations approved by Congress at taxpayer expense?
  • Does that include a marked-to-market accounting of Mortgage Backed Securities on its balance sheet?
  • Does that include a marked-to-market accounting of anything other than specific items the Fed wanted marked-to-market?

The Fed conveniently ignores all of its recommendations that cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, some done illegally, and then has the self-serving, selective-myopia gall to talk about “gains”.

Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Anyone thinking clearly has to agree.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

guest post by Kelly Diels

In November, I rebranded and relaunched my blog. I screwed up, I suffered, I sniffled, I refuted the advances of a pervy tech wizard. And I thought: I’d better track my results to see if this was worth it. This better have been worth it.

It was.

On November 10, my Alexa rank was 1,082,076.

Two months and one day later, it is 173,556.

So, in just two short months (and one day), I raised my Alexa rank by almost one million places.

In three months (in the screen shot above, look at the bottom right figure of 1,766,896), my Alexa rank increased by almost two million places.

How’d I do it? I’m so glad you asked.

Once you get past the first set of ingredients – have a seriously small and unpopular blog – the recipe is simple. It simply requires a ridiculous amount of work and a bit of creativity.

Still, I’ve itemized and analyzed what I did differently in the last two months just so I could whisper sexy blog secrets in your ear.

Here is a list of my torrid confessions.

1. Write unique stuff

Yes, this is just another way of saying “write great content! great content! great content!”. There’s a reason everyone says it, repeatedly: because it works.

I admit it. When I started blogging, I was a wannabe. I wanted to be Steve Pavlina, Darren Rowse or Yaro Starak.

Now, I just wannabe myself. I’m lit-on-fire for the written word, I have big, ballsy opinions, I’m in bed with surprise, and I love to love. That all shines through in my transparent and sometimes pulpy posts. I know the blogging and business-writing rules and alternate between obeying them and breaking them with abandon. It is roller coaster writing, to be sure, but it seems to be a ride with an lengthening line up.

The lesson: be you, write you, and write wild and free.

2. Get your great stuff out there

In two words: guest post.

I don’t have a commenting strategy – or maybe I do, but it goes like this: don’t really do it, unless profoundly moved or delighted by the post or am crushin’ on the writer and you know who you are – so guest posts are almost exclusively how I get in front of new audiences.

Guest posts bump up my traffic significantly. In the last two months, the single greatest driver of my traffic was, you guessed it, ProBlogger. There was even one day when I had two guest posts up on both ProBlogger and Write to Done.

That day was a good day.

(That day was the day I started making money – but that’s another post, entirely.)

You know who I blame for my promiscuous guest-posting?

Josh Hanagarne, World’s Strongest Librarian. He encouraged/pushed/nagged me to guest post, but I was too timid. (Really. I was scared. What if people said no? Rejection is not my thing.) When coaxing me to approach other bloggers failed, spectacularly, he took a new approach.

He demanded a guest post from me for his site. So I sent him one and his people loved me up. It was like rolling around in a meadow full of daisies and puppies and then a unicorn slid down a rainbow and gave me a cupcake. Magic.

Then, after more encouraging/pushing/nagging from Josh, I wrote a guest post for Darren Rowse at ProBlogger. Of course, I didn’t submit it for ten days until I got exasperated by my own cowardice, cursed myself out and straight-up courted that fearsome dragon – Rejection – by pressing send.

Darren accepted it in something like 15 minutes and made nice virtual noises. Later, he said he’d publish as much as I could send him. That was all I need to hear. I sent him A LOT.

Suddenly I had confidence and started sending pieces all over the place.

And my blog grew. So did my traffic.

The lesson? Guest posts work predictable magic on your blog. Go forth, guest post, bewitch and bedazzle.

And have big, strong, nagging friends.

3. Write more, more often

I used to post new pieces 1-3 times a week. Now I post 5-7 times a week. I’ve simply developed a habit of writing every night. It is sometimes painful, almost always exhausting, I’m wasting money on cable I never watch, Facebook misses me something fierce, and I have very nearly stopped dating.

(Very nearly. Not entirely. If I stopped dating, what would I write about? I romance in the name of research. THAT’S HOW MUCH I LOVE ALL OF YOU.)

And then there’s Twitter. I’ve written 322,560 words on Twitter, which is basically a novel in Tweets.

Oh. That just made me a little sad.

But other than that twinge – I could have written a novel in the time I spent Tweeting, oh yes that stings - I’m ecstatic. I’m having so much fun. I’m seeing results.

And my blog is growing.

The lesson? Don’t worry about statistics. Worry about quality.

I didn’t set out explicitly to raise my Alexa rank. I set out to improve my blog, light my writing on fire, and make a lil’ love to my people (and find more of them). And, as a result, my blog took off and took my Alexa rank with it.

You can do it, too. Please do.

And then tell me all about it on Twitter, where I still won’t be writing my novel.

_____________________

Kelly Diels is a wildly hireable freelance writer and the creator of Cleavage, a blog about three things we all want more of: sex, money and meaning.

http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71 http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.prlog.org/tag/online-stock-trading/ http://www.prlog.org/10219817-online-traders-discover-reits-and-real-estate-mutual-funds-to-be-good-investment.html http://www.prlog.org/10248797-reitbuyercom-offers-opportunity-to-onlinereal-estate-stock-traders-in-albuquerque-new-mexico.html http://www.webjam.com/gabrielle71

The Fed is pulling out all stops to defend its secrets, including publishing self-serving mathematical gibberish. Please consider the St. Louis Fed article on the Social Cost of Transparency.

Unless you are an academic wonk, you will be stymied by pages that look like this …

There are 24 pages of such nonsense with titles like

  • 2.2 Private Information and Full Commitment
  • 2.3 Private Information and Limited Commitment
  • 3.2.1 Decision Making in the Day
  • 3.2.2 Decision Making at Night
  • 3.2.4 A No-News Economy

Just for good measure here is the page describing 3.2.4 A No-News Economy

The article culminates with …

For an asset economy then, the prescription of “full transparency” is not generally warranted.

Approaching the problem under the premise that fuller transparency is always desirable may not be the right place to start.

Hiding Behind Empirical Formulas

The problem is Bernanke places his complete faith in such gibberish, so much so that he has lost all sense of real world action by real people. The result is that in spite of his PhD, he could not see a housing bubble that was obvious to anyone using a single ounce of common sense.

Moreover, had Bernanke simply opened his eyes instead of relying on a poor interpretation of an already fatally flawed Taylor Rule, the credit/housing bubble would not have gotten as big as it did, and we might not be discussing the above ridiculous mathematical formulas that supposedly show us the Fed needs to be secretive.

For more on Bernanke's love affair with the Taylor Rule (even though Taylor Disputes Bernanke on its usage), please see Taylor, NY Times, Dean Baker Call Out Bernanke.

Appeals Court To Hear Bloomberg's Freedom of Information Suit

Bloomberg has been in a battle with the Fed for two years over the Fed's “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. In August it “won” the lawsuit but the Fed has appealed.

Please consider Federal Reserve Seeks to Protect U.S. Bailout Secrets.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Manhattan will decide whether the Fed must release records of the unprecedented $2 trillion U.S. loan program launched after the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. In August, a federal judge ordered that the information be released, responding to a request by Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Banks and the Fed warn that bailed-out lenders may be hurt if the documents are made public, causing a run or a sell-off by investors. Disclosure may hamstring the Fed’s ability to deal with another crisis, they also argued. The lower court agreed with Bloomberg.

The ruling by the three-judge appeals panel may not come for months and is unlikely to be the final word. The loser may seek a rehearing or appeal to the full appeals court and eventually petition the U.S. Supreme Court, said Anne Weismann, chief lawyer for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, a Washington advocacy group that supports Bloomberg’s lawsuit.

In her Aug. 24 ruling, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in New York said loan records are covered by FOIA and rejected the Fed’s claim that their disclosure might harm banks and shareholders. An exception to the statute that protects trade secrets and privileged or confidential financial data didn’t apply because there’s no proof banks would suffer, she said.

The central bank “speculates on how a borrower might enter a downward spiral of financial instability if its participation in the Federal Reserve lending programs were to be disclosed,” Preska, the chief judge of the Manhattan federal court, said in her 47-page ruling. “Conjecture, without evidence of imminent harm, simply fails to meet the board’s burden” of proof.

By the time the documents are released, the information may be useless, or not. Regardless, the battle is worth fighting just over the principles of the matter.

Fed Faces Subpoena Over AIG bailout

On Tuesday I commented on House Plans To Subpoena Geithner Over AIG Decisions

AP

Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., said Tuesday he will subpoena the New York Fed for documents related to the bailout of failed insurer American International Group Inc.

Towns chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The committee is investigating deals that diverted billions of AIG bailout dollars to banks including Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

The committee has been investigating e-mails from New York Fed lawyers telling AIG not to disclose details about the deal. The e-mails were released last week by California Rep. Darrell Issa., the committee's top Republican.

Issa asked Towns to subpoena the New York Fed after the Fed blocked a separate request for documents.

Audit The Fed

Of course we cannot forget Ron Paul's Audit The Fed measure that has passed the house. These measures show just how angry everyone is over the Fed.

The Fed has increased that anger and resentment by pointing the finger at everyone else. For details, please see Ben Bernanke Looks In Mirror, Sees Barney Frank.

Three Front Attack

  • Appeals Court To Hear Bloomberg's Freedom of Information Suit
  • Fed Faces Subpoena Over AIG bailout
  • Audit The Fed

The more the Fed squirms in secrecy and denial, the more public resentment builds. The more public resentment builds, the more likely the Senate will go along with “audit the Fed”.

What's On The Fed's Balance Sheet?

The Fed's balance sheet (better thought of as a diaper or a garbage dump), is not only smelly, it is bulging bigger by the day.

We have a right to know what the Fed is doing, what the assets it is holding are worth, and what arrangements it might have illegally made with AIG or others.

Yesterday the Washington Post reported Federal Reserve earned $45 billion in 2009.

I have a few questions.

Really?!

  • Does that count the $185 billion the NY Fed crammed down taxpayers throats over AIG?
  • Does that count the real cost of any of its other inane off-balance-sheet recommendations approved by Congress at taxpayer expense?
  • Does that include a marked-to-market accounting of Mortgage Backed Securities on its balance sheet?
  • Does that include a marked-to-market accounting of anything other than specific items the Fed wanted marked-to-market?

The Fed conveniently ignores all of its recommendations that cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, some done illegally, and then has the self-serving, selective-myopia gall to talk about “gains”.

Bloomberg argues that the public has the right to know basic information about the “unprecedented and highly controversial use” of public money. Anyone thinking clearly has to agree.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List

guest post by Kelly Diels

In November, I rebranded and relaunched my blog. I screwed up, I suffered, I sniffled, I refuted the advances of a pervy tech wizard. And I thought: I’d better track my results to see if this was worth it. This better have been worth it.

It was.

On November 10, my Alexa rank was 1,082,076.

Two months and one day later, it is 173,556.

So, in just two short months (and one day), I raised my Alexa rank by almost one million places.

In three months (in the screen shot above, look at the bottom right figure of 1,766,896), my Alexa rank increased by almost two million places.

How’d I do it? I’m so glad you asked.

Once you get past the first set of ingredients – have a seriously small and unpopular blog – the recipe is simple. It simply requires a ridiculous amount of work and a bit of creativity.

Still, I’ve itemized and analyzed what I did differently in the last two months just so I could whisper sexy blog secrets in your ear.

Here is a list of my torrid confessions.

1. Write unique stuff

Yes, this is just another way of saying “write great content! great content! great content!”. There’s a reason everyone says it, repeatedly: because it works.

I admit it. When I started blogging, I was a wannabe. I wanted to be Steve Pavlina, Darren Rowse or Yaro Starak.

Now, I just wannabe myself. I’m lit-on-fire for the written word, I have big, ballsy opinions, I’m in bed with surprise, and I love to love. That all shines through in my transparent and sometimes pulpy posts. I know the blogging and business-writing rules and alternate between obeying them and breaking them with abandon. It is roller coaster writing, to be sure, but it seems to be a ride with an lengthening line up.

The lesson: be you, write you, and write wild and free.

2. Get your great stuff out there

In two words: guest post.

I don’t have a commenting strategy – or maybe I do, but it goes like this: don’t really do it, unless profoundly moved or delighted by the post or am crushin’ on the writer and you know who you are – so guest posts are almost exclusively how I get in front of new audiences.

Guest posts bump up my traffic significantly. In the last two months, the single greatest driver of my traffic was, you guessed it, ProBlogger. There was even one day when I had two guest posts up on both ProBlogger and Write to Done.

That day was a good day.

(That day was the day I started making money – but that’s another post, entirely.)

You know who I blame for my promiscuous guest-posting?

Josh Hanagarne, World’s Strongest Librarian. He encouraged/pushed/nagged me to guest post, but I was too timid. (Really. I was scared. What if people said no? Rejection is not my thing.) When coaxing me to approach other bloggers failed, spectacularly, he took a new approach.

He demanded a guest post from me for his site. So I sent him one and his people loved me up. It was like rolling around in a meadow full of daisies and puppies and then a unicorn slid down a rainbow and gave me a cupcake. Magic.

Then, after more encouraging/pushing/nagging from Josh, I wrote a guest post for Darren Rowse at ProBlogger. Of course, I didn’t submit it for ten days until I got exasperated by my own cowardice, cursed myself out and straight-up courted that fearsome dragon – Rejection – by pressing send.

Darren accepted it in something like 15 minutes and made nice virtual noises. Later, he said he’d publish as much as I could send him. That was all I need to hear. I sent him A LOT.

Suddenly I had confidence and started sending pieces all over the place.

And my blog grew. So did my traffic.

The lesson? Guest posts work predictable magic on your blog. Go forth, guest post, bewitch and bedazzle.

And have big, strong, nagging friends.

3. Write more, more often

I used to post new pieces 1-3 times a week. Now I post 5-7 times a week. I’ve simply developed a habit of writing every night. It is sometimes painful, almost always exhausting, I’m wasting money on cable I never watch, Facebook misses me something fierce, and I have very nearly stopped dating.

(Very nearly. Not entirely. If I stopped dating, what would I write about? I romance in the name of research. THAT’S HOW MUCH I LOVE ALL OF YOU.)

And then there’s Twitter. I’ve written 322,560 words on Twitter, which is basically a novel in Tweets.

Oh. That just made me a little sad.

But other than that twinge – I could have written a novel in the time I spent Tweeting, oh yes that stings - I’m ecstatic. I’m having so much fun. I’m seeing results.

And my blog is growing.

The lesson? Don’t worry about statistics. Worry about quality.

I didn’t set out explicitly to raise my Alexa rank. I set out to improve my blog, light my writing on fire, and make a lil’ love to my people (and find more of them). And, as a result, my blog took off and took my Alexa rank with it.

You can do it, too. Please do.

And then tell me all about it on Twitter, where I still won’t be writing my novel.

_____________________

Kelly Diels is a wildly hireable freelance writer and the creator of Cleavage, a blog about three things we all want more of: sex, money and meaning.

CB Commission Boost  by reviews1199

Fox <b>News</b> Shuns Obama Q&amp;A, MSNBC Gets Snitty When He Encourages <b>…</b>

President Obama this morning took his 2010 Question-And-Answer Tour to the Senate Democratic Caucus, a few days after his foray to the House GOP Retreat in Baltimore turned into must-see TV.

Adobe CTO: Flash is 'ready' for iPhone, iPad | iLounge <b>News</b>

If you have a comment, <b>news</b> tip, advertising inquiry, or coverage request, a question about iPods or accessories, or if you sell or market iPod products or services, read iLounge's Comments + Questions policies before posting, …

Jon Stewart Talks Fox <b>News</b> On The O'Reilly Factor - Tuned In <b>…</b>

Last night we saw one of the best debates about media and politics in general, and Fox <b>News</b> in particular, that I've seen on TV in a while. That it was conducted by a professional talk-TV bloviator (Bill O'Reilly) and a late-night …

http://www.shumakerelays.com/

Written by empfehll in: Uncategorized | Tags:

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes | Hosted by WbLogIn.com